April 16, 2008
Choose Your Language Of Preference Below
French Version German Version Russian Version Spanish Version
Portuguese Version Chinese Version Arabic Version
In Zambia it’s higher taxes. In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) it’s who-knows-what next. But for each country, UBS Securities analyst Onno Rutten thinks the risk profile for mining is increasing. He has thus increased his discount rate on Zambian assets to 10% (from 8%) and DRC assets to 12% (from 10%).
Two companies that are obviously affected by this move are Equinox Minerals Ltd. and First Quantum Minerals Ltd. Mr. Rutten continues to assume the Zambian government will scrap the development agreement on the Equinox’s Lumwana project and First Quantum’s Kansanshi project, meaning both are subject to immediate windfall taxes.
He lowered his target on Equinox to $5.75 a share from $6.25 a share to reflect the higher discount rate, and reduced First Quantum to $108.00 from $115.00.
“If [Equinox or First Quantum] were to be successful in achieving a compromise with the Government or prevail in any international arbitration, there would be material upside to our valuation,” Mr. Rutten wrote.
Mr. Rutten also noted that he thinks both companies are attractive takeover targets for strategic buyers (like Chinese or Indian firms), especially those that would want physical claim to the copper produced. But the windfall taxes make a financially-oriented buyer less likely.
“The Windfall Tax effectively removes most of the upside leverage to the copper price and therefore removes a key incentive to invest,” he wrote.
April 16, 2008 at 4:48 pm
Rutten’s comments are borderline economic sabotage and must be called on. The usual problem with our PR efforts is that we react to bad news way too late.
The powers that be need to call on him to rescind this kind of bickering because there is no way, the peaceful Zambian Enterprise can be compared to DRC … thanks a trillion
April 17, 2008 at 8:51 am
Honestly, what the Zambian govt has simply done is to bring its taxation policy in the resource sector in line with the international norm. Canada, Australia, and USA for example have set their corporate tax at 35%. Mineral royalties in the various states and provinces of these countries range from 3% to 3.6%. So how is raising mineral royalties to 3% and corporate tax to 30 % politically risky and out of the norm? I am Zambian born and bred and at no time in my life have I ever felt that my life was at risk due to politics or civil strife in my country. This prejudice should stop. Zambia, Botswana and Tanzania are a group of countries that have had comparatively unsurpassed political stability be it in Africa, Asia, or Latin America. This sort of prejudice should stop.
April 18, 2008 at 5:31 am
How can you compare Zambia and DRC? Dum ass
April 18, 2008 at 2:29 pm
who the heck is this dude comparing Zambia to DRC?
April 19, 2008 at 6:10 pm
Mbulawa,
… axiomatic indeed. I am beginning to believe that some of these so called correspondents don’t even know what they correspond to.
I have a strong feeling the gentleman has never been to DRC before because if he has he would compare our enterprise to the chaos prevalent in that country … thanks a trillion.
Naliwina,
… welcome aboard, nice pics on your site too. Please use better endings next time around … thanks a trillion
Mabel,
… isn’t that pathetic? Your point exactly … thanks a trillion.